World Population: 5 scenarios |
As a follow
up to my post last week about the De-Darwinization of the human race due to the
development of contraception (but with a brief nod to music at the base),
further confirmation this week of my “End-of-the-World-in-5,400CE” prediction.
My
projection of population in that article (and in the AMiTe paper on ‘how we’ll
really meet E.T.’) was based on human population peaking at 10bn by 2100, then
halving every hundred years. This 10bn is now looking like an over-estimate. A new
study for the Club of Rome was published this week https://www.earth4all.life/news/global-population-could-peak-below-9-billion-in-2050s suggests the global population
could peak just below 9 billion people in 2050 then start falling. With a ‘Giant
Leap’ in investment in economic development, education and health then global
population could peak even lower and earlier.
So, how
about the halving? The second "more optimistic scenario" – with governments
across the world raising taxes on the wealthy to invest in education, social
services and improved equality – the report estimates human numbers would hit a
high of 8.5 billion as early as 2040 and then fall by about a third
to about 6 billion in 2100.
This fall of
29.5% in 60 years is very close to my estimate of halving in 100yrs (in fact, it’s
equivalent to 44% fall per 100 years, just exponential mathematics). And why
would it stop? People tend to revolt from the idea that very low birth rates might
become embedded and get dewy-eyed with visions of Little House on the Prairie,
but can’t explain why the trend, already a reality in developed countries, would
significantly alter. It’s OK, people/societies will be just as happy/unhappy and
probably as obsessed and inward looking as they are now.
The most
cogent reason for a here-to-stay trend was hinted this week by Elon Musk and
his pals, re Artificial Intelligence, GPT etc in Pause Giant AI Experiments: AnOpen Letter - Future of Life Institute. The key question re human futures (and
decisions on family size) was, for me, not all the tosh about A.I. being inimical
or running amok. Much more significant was the socio-economic question of “Should
we automate away all the jobs, including the fulfilling ones?“ This will entrench the worries of parents, on
top of the global turbulence we are seeing now (and the rest…) about whether
their kid(s) will find fulfilling roles; the conventional wisdom will become to
be conservative on number of progeny.
But water finds its own level, so society will be just as happy/unhappy
as ours, self-similar, in-fact.
It makes you
yearn for the good old days, when we were “a little bit naïve” The Begat: Finian’sRainbow. How’s that for a bit of Darwin-related music (‘Ratio of increase so
high…”)? We performed that at our folk-music session last week, minus dancing.
Chuck Cooper & cast in FINIANS RAINBOW 2009 Broadway (Harburg & Lane)
Picture credit: Earth4All report (linked article), FiniansonBroadway.com